Number of days experiencing homelessness [ Time Frame: At 6 months after randomization ]
‘Stable housing’ will be defined as any form of housing that does not meet the definition of ‘experiencing homelessness’ as above
Number of days experiencing homelessness [ Time Frame: At 12 months after randomization ]
‘Stable housing’ will be defined as any form of housing that does not meet the definition of ‘experiencing homelessness’ as above
Number of days experiencing homelessness [ Time Frame: At 18 months after randomization ]
‘Stable housing’ will be defined as any form of housing that does not meet the definition of ‘experiencing homelessness’ as above
Number of days experiencing homelessness [ Time Frame: At 27 months after randomization ]
‘Stable housing’ will be defined as any form of housing that does not meet the definition of ‘experiencing homelessness’ as above
Number of days experiencing homelessness [ Time Frame: At 30 months after randomization ]
‘Stable housing’ will be defined as any form of housing that does not meet the definition of ‘experiencing homelessness’ as above
Number of days experiencing homelessness [ Time Frame: At 36 months after randomization ]
‘Stable housing’ will be defined as any form of housing that does not meet the definition of ‘experiencing homelessness’ as above
Time to stable housing from randomization [ Time Frame: Up to 24 months after randomization ]
‘Stable housing’ will be defined as any form of housing that does not meet the definition of ‘experiencing homelessness’ as above
Proportion of families who obtain stable housing [ Time Frame: At 6 months after randomization ]
‘Stable housing’ will be defined as any form of housing that does not meet the definition of ‘experiencing homelessness’ as above
Proportion of families who obtain stable housing [ Time Frame: At 12 months after randomization ]
‘Stable housing’ will be defined as any form of housing that does not meet the definition of ‘experiencing homelessness’ as above
Proportion of families who obtain stable housing [ Time Frame: At 18 months after randomization ]
‘Stable housing’ will be defined as any form of housing that does not meet the definition of ‘experiencing homelessness’ as above
Proportion of families who obtain stable housing [ Time Frame: At 24 months after randomization ]
‘Stable housing’ will be defined as any form of housing that does not meet the definition of ‘experiencing homelessness’ as above
Proportion of families who retain stable housing after the end of the 24-month intervention period [ Time Frame: At 27 months after randomization ]
‘Stable housing’ will be defined as any form of housing that does not meet the definition of ‘experiencing homelessness’ as above
Proportion of families who retain stable housing after the end of the 24-month intervention period [ Time Frame: At 30 months after randomization ]
‘Stable housing’ will be defined as any form of housing that does not meet the definition of ‘experiencing homelessness’ as above
Proportion of families who retain stable housing after the end of the 24-month intervention period [ Time Frame: At 36 months after randomization ]
‘Stable housing’ will be defined as any form of housing that does not meet the definition of ‘experiencing homelessness’ as above
Days experiencing unsheltered homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: At baseline ]
Number of days spent living in a homeless shelter, in a place not typically used for sleeping, such as on the street, in a car, in an abandoned building, or in a bus or train station, or temporarily in an institution
Days experiencing unsheltered homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: At 6 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent living in a homeless shelter, in a place not typically used for sleeping, such as on the street, in a car, in an abandoned building, or in a bus or train station, or temporarily in an institution
Days experiencing unsheltered homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: At 12 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent living in a homeless shelter, in a place not typically used for sleeping, such as on the street, in a car, in an abandoned building, or in a bus or train station, or temporarily in an institution
Days experiencing unsheltered homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: At 18 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent living in a homeless shelter, in a place not typically used for sleeping, such as on the street, in a car, in an abandoned building, or in a bus or train station, or temporarily in an institution
Days experiencing unsheltered homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: At 24 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent living in a homeless shelter, in a place not typically used for sleeping, such as on the street, in a car, in an abandoned building, or in a bus or train station, or temporarily in an institution
Days experiencing unsheltered homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: At 30 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent living in a homeless shelter, in a place not typically used for sleeping, such as on the street, in a car, in an abandoned building, or in a bus or train station, or temporarily in an institution
Days experiencing unsheltered homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: At 36 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent living in a homeless shelter, in a place not typically used for sleeping, such as on the street, in a car, in an abandoned building, or in a bus or train station, or temporarily in an institution
Time series analysis of days experiencing unsheltered homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent living in a homeless shelter, in a place not typically used for sleeping, such as on the street, in a car, in an abandoned building, or in a bus or train station, or temporarily in an institution
Days residing in a hotel or motel in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Number of days spent residing in a hotel or motel as a form of temporary housing
Days residing in a hotel or motel in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent residing in a hotel or motel as a form of temporary housing
Days residing in a hotel or motel in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent residing in a hotel or motel as a form of temporary housing
Days residing in a hotel or motel in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent residing in a hotel or motel as a form of temporary housing
Days residing in a hotel or motel in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent residing in a hotel or motel as a form of temporary housing
Days residing in a hotel or motel in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent residing in a hotel or motel as a form of temporary housing
Days residing in a hotel or motel in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent residing in a hotel or motel as a form of temporary housing
Time series analysis of days residing in a hotel or motel in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent residing in a hotel or motel as a form of temporary housing
Proportion of families who are unleased [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Residing in a space without any legal right to the space (i.e., residing in a space without a lease)
Proportion of families who are unleased [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Residing in a space without any legal right to the space (i.e., residing in a space without a lease)
Proportion of families who are unleased [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Residing in a space without any legal right to the space (i.e., residing in a space without a lease)
Proportion of families who are unleased [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Residing in a space without any legal right to the space (i.e., residing in a space without a lease)
Proportion of families who are unleased [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Residing in a space without any legal right to the space (i.e., residing in a space without a lease)
Proportion of families who are unleased [ Time Frame: 27 months after randomization ]
Residing in a space without any legal right to the space (i.e., residing in a space without a lease)
Proportion of families who are unleased [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Residing in a space without any legal right to the space (i.e., residing in a space without a lease)
Proportion of families who are unleased [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Residing in a space without any legal right to the space (i.e., residing in a space without a lease)
Time series analysis of proportion of families who are unleased [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 27 months 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Will assess change in proportion of families who are unleased over time (i.e, residing in a space without a lease)
Change in proportion of families who are unleased at baseline vs 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 24 months after randomization ]
Residing in a space without any legal right to the space (i.e., residing in a space without a lease)
Change in proportion of families who are unleased at baseline vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 36 months after randomization ]
Residing in a space without any legal right to the space (i.e., residing in a space without a lease)
Change in proportion of families who are unleased at 24 vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at 24 and 36 months after randomization ]
Residing in a space without any legal right to the space (i.e., residing in a space without a lease)
Days doubled up in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Number of days spent in a shared living situation intended to be temporary (‘doubled up’ with a friend or relative due to being unable to find or afford own housing)
Days doubled up in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent in a shared living situation intended to be temporary (‘doubled up’ with a friend or relative due to being unable to find or afford own housing)
Days doubled up in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent in a shared living situation intended to be temporary (‘doubled up’ with a friend or relative due to being unable to find or afford own housing)
Days doubled up in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent in a shared living situation intended to be temporary (‘doubled up’ with a friend or relative due to being unable to find or afford own housing)
Days doubled up in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent in a shared living situation intended to be temporary (‘doubled up’ with a friend or relative due to being unable to find or afford own housing)
Days doubled up in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent in a shared living situation intended to be temporary (‘doubled up’ with a friend or relative due to being unable to find or afford own housing)
Days doubled up in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent in a shared living situation intended to be temporary (‘doubled up’ with a friend or relative due to being unable to find or afford own housing)
Time series analysis of days doubled up in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Number of days spent in a shared living situation intended to be temporary (‘doubled up’ with a friend or relative due to being unable to find or afford own housing)
Total proportion of families experiencing any homelessness [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Proportion of of families experiencing homelessness for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families experiencing any homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Proportion of of families experiencing homelessness for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families experiencing any homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Proportion of of families experiencing homelessness for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families experiencing any homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Proportion of of families experiencing homelessness for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families experiencing any homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Proportion of of families experiencing homelessness for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families experiencing any homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Proportion of of families experiencing homelessness for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families experiencing any homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Proportion of of families experiencing homelessness for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families experiencing any homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Proportion of of families experiencing homelessness for ≥1 night during study period
Time series analysis of proportion of families experiencing any homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Proportion of of families experiencing homelessness for ≥1 night during study period
Total proportion of families ever experiencing unsheltered homelessness [ Time Frame: At 24 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families living in a homeless shelter, in a place not typically used for sleeping, such as on the street, in a car, in an abandoned building, or in a bus or train station, or temporarily, in an institution for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families experiencing unsheltered homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Proportion of families living in a homeless shelter, in a place not typically used for sleeping, such as on the street, in a car, in an abandoned building, or in a bus or train station, or temporarily, in an institution for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families experiencing unsheltered homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families living in a homeless shelter, in a place not typically used for sleeping, such as on the street, in a car, in an abandoned building, or in a bus or train station, or temporarily, in an institution for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families experiencing unsheltered homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families living in a homeless shelter, in a place not typically used for sleeping, such as on the street, in a car, in an abandoned building, or in a bus or train station, or temporarily, in an institution for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families experiencing unsheltered homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families living in a homeless shelter, in a place not typically used for sleeping, such as on the street, in a car, in an abandoned building, or in a bus or train station, or temporarily, in an institution for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families experiencing unsheltered homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families living in a homeless shelter, in a place not typically used for sleeping, such as on the street, in a car, in an abandoned building, or in a bus or train station, or temporarily, in an institution for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families experiencing unsheltered homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families living in a homeless shelter, in a place not typically used for sleeping, such as on the street, in a car, in an abandoned building, or in a bus or train station, or temporarily, in an institution for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families experiencing unsheltered homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families living in a homeless shelter, in a place not typically used for sleeping, such as on the street, in a car, in an abandoned building, or in a bus or train station, or temporarily, in an institution for ≥1 night during study period
Time series analysis of proportion of families experiencing unsheltered homelessness in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families living in a homeless shelter, in a place not typically used for sleeping, such as on the street, in a car, in an abandoned building, or in a bus or train station, or temporarily, in an institution for ≥1 night during study period
Total proportion of families ever residing in a hotel or motel [ Time Frame: At 24 months after randomization; and changes between baseline and 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after randomization; and changes between 24 and 36 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families living in a hotel or motel as a form of temporary housing for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families residing in a hotel or motel in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Proportion of families living in a hotel or motel as a form of temporary housing for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families residing in a hotel or motel in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families living in a hotel or motel as a form of temporary housing for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families residing in a hotel or motel in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families living in a hotel or motel as a form of temporary housing for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families residing in a hotel or motel in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families living in a hotel or motel as a form of temporary housing for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families residing in a hotel or motel in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families living in a hotel or motel as a form of temporary housing for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families residing in a hotel or motel in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families living in a hotel or motel as a form of temporary housing for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families residing in a hotel or motel in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families living in a hotel or motel as a form of temporary housing for ≥1 night during study period
Time series analysis of proportion of families residing in a hotel or motel in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families living in a hotel or motel as a form of temporary housing for ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families doubled up in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Proportion of families in a shared living situation intended to be temporary (‘doubled up’ with a friend or relative due to being unable to find or afford own housing) ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families doubled up in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families in a shared living situation intended to be temporary (‘doubled up’ with a friend or relative due to being unable to find or afford own housing) ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families doubled up in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families in a shared living situation intended to be temporary (‘doubled up’ with a friend or relative due to being unable to find or afford own housing) ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families doubled up in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families in a shared living situation intended to be temporary (‘doubled up’ with a friend or relative due to being unable to find or afford own housing) ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families doubled up in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families in a shared living situation intended to be temporary (‘doubled up’ with a friend or relative due to being unable to find or afford own housing) ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families doubled up in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families in a shared living situation intended to be temporary (‘doubled up’ with a friend or relative due to being unable to find or afford own housing) ≥1 night during study period
Proportion of families doubled up in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families in a shared living situation intended to be temporary (‘doubled up’ with a friend or relative due to being unable to find or afford own housing) ≥1 night during study period
Time series analysis of proportion of families doubled up in previous 6 months [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families in a shared living situation intended to be temporary (‘doubled up’ with a friend or relative due to being unable to find or afford own housing) ≥1 night during study period
Total proportion of families returning to a homeless shelter [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families with any return to a homeless shelter at any time between randomization and the end of the 24-month study period. Assessed only in the subgroup of families who reported living in a shelter at baseline.
Total proportion of families returning to a homeless shelter [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families with any return to a homeless shelter at any time between 24 months and 36 months after randomization. Assessed only in the subgroup of families who reported living in a shelter at baseline.Assessed only in the subgroup of families who reported living in a shelter at baseline.
Total proportion of families living in a homeless shelter [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Proportion of families who report any stay in a homeless shelter at baseline
Total proportion of families living in a homeless shelter [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families who report any stay in a homeless shelter after randomization and before the end of the 24-month intervention period
Total proportion of families living in a homeless shelter [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Proportion of families who report any stay in a homeless shelter at the end of the 36-month data collection period
Change in total proportion of families living in a homeless shelter from baseline to 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 24 months ]
Proportion of families who report any stay in a homeless shelter at baseline vs 24 months
Change in total proportion of families living in a homeless shelter from baseline to 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 36 months ]
Proportion of families who report any stay in a homeless shelter at baseline vs 36 months
Change in total proportion of families living in a homeless shelter from 24 to 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at 24 and 36 months ]
Proportion of families who report any stay in a homeless shelter at 24 vs 36 months
Proportion of monthly income spent on housing-related expenses (composite of expenses for rent, mortgage, other shelter, and/or hotel/motel) [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Housing affordability
Proportion of monthly income spent on housing-related expenses (composite of expenses for rent, mortgage, other shelter, and/or hotel/motel) [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Housing affordability
Proportion of monthly income spent on housing-related expenses (composite of expenses for rent, mortgage, other shelter, and/or hotel/motel) [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Housing affordability
Proportion of monthly income spent on housing-related expenses (composite of expenses for rent, mortgage, other shelter, and/or hotel/motel) [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Housing affordability
Proportion of monthly income spent on housing-related expenses (composite of expenses for rent, mortgage, other shelter, and/or hotel/motel) [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Housing affordability
Proportion of monthly income spent on housing-related expenses (composite of expenses for rent, mortgage, other shelter, and/or hotel/motel) [ Time Frame: 27 months after randomization ]
Housing affordability
Proportion of monthly income spent on housing-related expenses (composite of expenses for rent, mortgage, other shelter, and/or hotel/motel) [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Housing affordability
Proportion of monthly income spent on housing-related expenses (composite of expenses for rent, mortgage, other shelter, and/or hotel/motel) [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Housing affordability
Time series analysis of proportion of monthly income spent on housing-related expenses (composite of expenses for rent, mortgage, other shelter, and/or hotel/motel) [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 27 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Housing affordability
Change in proportion of monthly income spent on housing-related expenses at baseline vs 24 months (composite of expenses for rent, mortgage, other shelter, and/or hotel/motel) [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 24 months after randomization ]
Housing affordability
Change in proportion of monthly income spent on housing-related expenses at baseline vs 36 months (composite of expenses for rent, mortgage, other shelter, and/or hotel/motel) [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 36 months after randomization ]
Housing affordability
Change in proportion of monthly income spent on housing-related expenses at 24 vs 36 months (composite of expenses for rent, mortgage, other shelter, and/or hotel/motel) [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at 24 and 36 months after randomization ]
Housing affordability
Number of moves in prior 6 months [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Housing stability
Number of moves in prior 6 months [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Housing stability
Number of moves in prior 6 months [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Housing stability
Number of moves in prior 6 months [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Housing stability
Number of moves in prior 6 months [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Housing stability
Number of moves in prior 6 months [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Housing stability
Number of moves in prior 6 months [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Housing stability
Time series analysis of number of moves in prior 6 months [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Housing stability
Number of moves out of Santa Clara County in prior 6 months [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Housing stability
Number of moves out of Santa Clara County in prior 6 months [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Housing stability
Number of moves out of Santa Clara County in prior 6 months [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Housing stability
Number of moves out of Santa Clara County in prior 6 months [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Housing stability
Number of moves out of Santa Clara County in prior 6 months [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Housing stability
Number of moves out of Santa Clara County in prior 6 months [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Housing stability
Time series analysis of number of moves out of Santa Clara County in prior 6 months [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Housing stability
Monthly household expenditures [ Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 27 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Proportion/amount of monthly expenses on key household expenditure categories, assessed through selected questions adapted from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditures Survey
Physical well-being [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Measured through the Short-Form 12 v2 (SF12v2). The SF12v2 data calculate two summary component scores, Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) and Mental Health Component Summary Score (MCS) with eight sub-domains. Scores range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Physical well-being [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Short-Form 12 v2 (SF12v2). The SF12v2 data calculate two summary component scores, Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) and Mental Health Component Summary Score (MCS) with eight sub-domains. Scores range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Physical well-being [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Short-Form 12 v2 (SF12v2). The SF12v2 data calculate two summary component scores, Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) and Mental Health Component Summary Score (MCS) with eight sub-domains. Scores range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Physical well-being [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Short-Form 12 v2 (SF12v2). The SF12v2 data calculate two summary component scores, Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) and Mental Health Component Summary Score (MCS) with eight sub-domains. Scores range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Physical well-being [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Short-Form 12 v2 (SF12v2). The SF12v2 data calculate two summary component scores, Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) and Mental Health Component Summary Score (MCS) with eight sub-domains. Scores range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Physical well-being [ Time Frame: 27 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Short-Form 12 v2 (SF12v2). The SF12v2 data calculate two summary component scores, Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) and Mental Health Component Summary Score (MCS) with eight sub-domains. Scores range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Physical well-being [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Short-Form 12 v2 (SF12v2). The SF12v2 data calculate two summary component scores, Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) and Mental Health Component Summary Score (MCS) with eight sub-domains. Scores range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Physical well-being [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Short-Form 12 v2 (SF12v2). The SF12v2 data calculate two summary component scores, Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) and Mental Health Component Summary Score (MCS) with eight sub-domains. Scores range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Time series analysis of physical well-being [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Short-Form 12 v2 (SF12v2). The SF12v2 data calculate two summary component scores, Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) and Mental Health Component Summary Score (MCS) with eight sub-domains. Scores range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Change in physical well-being at baseline vs 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 24 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Short-Form 12 v2 (SF12v2). The SF12v2 data calculate two summary component scores, Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) and Mental Health Component Summary Score (MCS) with eight sub-domains. Scores range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Change in physical well-being at baseline vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Short-Form 12 v2 (SF12v2). The SF12v2 data calculate two summary component scores, Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) and Mental Health Component Summary Score (MCS) with eight sub-domains. Scores range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Change in physical well-being at 24 vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at 24 and 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Short-Form 12 v2 (SF12v2). The SF12v2 data calculate two summary component scores, Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) and Mental Health Component Summary Score (MCS) with eight sub-domains. Scores range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Psychological well-being [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Measured through the Kessler 6 (K6) scale. Each of the six items of the K6 is scored using a 5-level response scale, ranging from 0 to 4 (0 = none of the time, 1 = a little of the time, 2 = some of the time, 3 = most of the time, 4 = all of the time). The six items are summed to yield a total score with a range between zero and 24 with higher scores indicating higher psychological distress.
Psychological well-being [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Kessler 6 (K6) scale. Each of the six items of the K6 is scored using a 5-level response scale, ranging from 0 to 4 (0 = none of the time, 1 = a little of the time, 2 = some of the time, 3 = most of the time, 4 = all of the time). The six items are summed to yield a total score with a range between zero and 24 with higher scores indicating higher psychological distress.
Psychological well-being [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Kessler 6 (K6) scale. Each of the six items of the K6 is scored using a 5-level response scale, ranging from 0 to 4 (0 = none of the time, 1 = a little of the time, 2 = some of the time, 3 = most of the time, 4 = all of the time). The six items are summed to yield a total score with a range between zero and 24 with higher scores indicating higher psychological distress.
Psychological well-being [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Kessler 6 (K6) scale. Each of the six items of the K6 is scored using a 5-level response scale, ranging from 0 to 4 (0 = none of the time, 1 = a little of the time, 2 = some of the time, 3 = most of the time, 4 = all of the time). The six items are summed to yield a total score with a range between zero and 24 with higher scores indicating higher psychological distress.
Psychological well-being [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Kessler 6 (K6) scale. Each of the six items of the K6 is scored using a 5-level response scale, ranging from 0 to 4 (0 = none of the time, 1 = a little of the time, 2 = some of the time, 3 = most of the time, 4 = all of the time). The six items are summed to yield a total score with a range between zero and 24 with higher scores indicating higher psychological distress.
Psychological well-being [ Time Frame: 27 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Kessler 6 (K6) scale. Each of the six items of the K6 is scored using a 5-level response scale, ranging from 0 to 4 (0 = none of the time, 1 = a little of the time, 2 = some of the time, 3 = most of the time, 4 = all of the time). The six items are summed to yield a total score with a range between zero and 24 with higher scores indicating higher psychological distress.
Psychological well-being [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Kessler 6 (K6) scale. Each of the six items of the K6 is scored using a 5-level response scale, ranging from 0 to 4 (0 = none of the time, 1 = a little of the time, 2 = some of the time, 3 = most of the time, 4 = all of the time). The six items are summed to yield a total score with a range between zero and 24 with higher scores indicating higher psychological distress.
Psychological well-being [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Kessler 6 (K6) scale. Each of the six items of the K6 is scored using a 5-level response scale, ranging from 0 to 4 (0 = none of the time, 1 = a little of the time, 2 = some of the time, 3 = most of the time, 4 = all of the time). The six items are summed to yield a total score with a range between zero and 24 with higher scores indicating higher psychological distress.
Time series analysis of psychological well-being [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Kessler 6 (K6) scale. Each of the six items of the K6 is scored using a 5-level response scale, ranging from 0 to 4 (0 = none of the time, 1 = a little of the time, 2 = some of the time, 3 = most of the time, 4 = all of the time). The six items are summed to yield a total score with a range between zero and 24 with higher scores indicating higher psychological distress.
Change in psychological well-being at baseline vs 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 24 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Kessler 6 (K6) scale. Each of the six items of the K6 is scored using a 5-level response scale, ranging from 0 to 4 (0 = none of the time, 1 = a little of the time, 2 = some of the time, 3 = most of the time, 4 = all of the time). The six items are summed to yield a total score with a range between zero and 24 with higher scores indicating higher psychological distress.
Change in psychological well-being at baseline vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Kessler 6 (K6) scale. Each of the six items of the K6 is scored using a 5-level response scale, ranging from 0 to 4 (0 = none of the time, 1 = a little of the time, 2 = some of the time, 3 = most of the time, 4 = all of the time). The six items are summed to yield a total score with a range between zero and 24 with higher scores indicating higher psychological distress.
Change in psychological well-being at 24 vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at 24 and 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Kessler 6 (K6) scale. Each of the six items of the K6 is scored using a 5-level response scale, ranging from 0 to 4 (0 = none of the time, 1 = a little of the time, 2 = some of the time, 3 = most of the time, 4 = all of the time). The six items are summed to yield a total score with a range between zero and 24 with higher scores indicating higher psychological distress.
Overcrowding [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
People per room excluding bathrooms and kitchens. A higher number of people per room is associated with increased overcrowding.
Overcrowding [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
People per room excluding bathrooms and kitchens. A higher number of people per room is associated with increased overcrowding.
Overcrowding [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
People per room excluding bathrooms and kitchens. A higher number of people per room is associated with increased overcrowding.
Overcrowding [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
People per room excluding bathrooms and kitchens. A higher number of people per room is associated with increased overcrowding.
Overcrowding [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
People per room excluding bathrooms and kitchens. A higher number of people per room is associated with increased overcrowding.
Overcrowding [ Time Frame: 27 months after randomization ]
People per room excluding bathrooms and kitchens. A higher number of people per room is associated with increased overcrowding.
Overcrowding [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
People per room excluding bathrooms and kitchens. A higher number of people per room is associated with increased overcrowding.
Overcrowding [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
People per room excluding bathrooms and kitchens. A higher number of people per room is associated with increased overcrowding.
Time series analysis of overcrowding [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
People per room excluding bathrooms and kitchens. A higher number of people per room is associated with increased overcrowding.
Change in overcrowding at baseline vs 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 24 months after randomization ]
People per room excluding bathrooms and kitchens. A higher number of people per room is associated with increased overcrowding.
Change in overcrowding at baseline vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 36 months after randomization ]
People per room excluding bathrooms and kitchens. A higher number of people per room is associated with increased overcrowding.
Change in overcrowding at 24 vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at 24 and 36 months after randomization ]
People per room excluding bathrooms and kitchens. A higher number of people per room is associated with increased overcrowding.
Housing quality [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Measured through proportion of households describing overall housing condition as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’. Measured only in the subset of households who respond that they are currently living in a house, apartment/condo, garage, or basement.
Housing quality [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of households describing overall housing condition as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’. Measured only in the subset of households who respond that they are currently living in a house, apartment/condo, garage, or basement.
Housing quality [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of households describing overall housing condition as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’. Measured only in the subset of households who respond that they are currently living in a house, apartment/condo, garage, or basement.
Housing quality [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of households describing overall housing condition as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’. Measured only in the subset of households who respond that they are currently living in a house, apartment/condo, garage, or basement.
Housing quality [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of households describing overall housing condition as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’. Measured only in the subset of households who respond that they are currently living in a house, apartment/condo, garage, or basement.
Housing quality [ Time Frame: 27 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of households describing overall housing condition as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’. Measured only in the subset of households who respond that they are currently living in a house, apartment/condo, garage, or basement.
Housing quality [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of households describing overall housing condition as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’. Measured only in the subset of households who respond that they are currently living in a house, apartment/condo, garage, or basement.
Housing quality [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of households describing overall housing condition as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’. Measured only in the subset of households who respond that they are currently living in a house, apartment/condo, garage, or basement.
Time series analysis of housing quality [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 27 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of households describing overall housing condition as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’. Measured only in the subset of households who respond that they are currently living in a house, apartment/condo, garage, or basement.
Change in housing quality from baseline to 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements from baseline and 24 months ]
Measured through proportion of households describing overall housing condition as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’. Measured only in the subset of households who respond that they are currently living in a house, apartment/condo, garage, or basement.
Change in housing quality from baseline to 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements from baseline and 36 months ]
Measured through proportion of households describing overall housing condition as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’. Measured only in the subset of households who respond that they are currently living in a house, apartment/condo, garage, or basement.
Change in housing quality from 24 to 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements from 24 and 36 months ]
Measured through proportion of households describing overall housing condition as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’. Measured only in the subset of households who respond that they are currently living in a house, apartment/condo, garage, or basement.
Housing quality: infrastructure and appliances [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Composite score assessing presence of a working stove/cooktop, refrigerator, kitchen sink, hot and cold water, bathroom sink with running water, toilet, and bathtub/shower. Range of total items present is 0-7, with higher score suggesting higher housing quality in terms of infrastructure and appliances. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Housing quality: infrastructure and appliances [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing presence of a working stove/cooktop, refrigerator, kitchen sink, hot and cold water, bathroom sink with running water, toilet, and bathtub/shower. Range of total items present is 0-7, with higher score suggesting higher housing quality in terms of infrastructure and appliances. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Housing quality: infrastructure and appliances [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing presence of a working stove/cooktop, refrigerator, kitchen sink, hot and cold water, bathroom sink with running water, toilet, and bathtub/shower. Range of total items present is 0-7, with higher score suggesting higher housing quality in terms of infrastructure and appliances. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Housing quality: infrastructure and appliances [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing presence of a working stove/cooktop, refrigerator, kitchen sink, hot and cold water, bathroom sink with running water, toilet, and bathtub/shower. Range of total items present is 0-7, with higher score suggesting higher housing quality in terms of infrastructure and appliances. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Housing quality: infrastructure and appliances [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing presence of a working stove/cooktop, refrigerator, kitchen sink, hot and cold water, bathroom sink with running water, toilet, and bathtub/shower. Range of total items present is 0-7, with higher score suggesting higher housing quality in terms of infrastructure and appliances. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Housing quality: infrastructure and appliances [ Time Frame: 27 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing presence of a working stove/cooktop, refrigerator, kitchen sink, hot and cold water, bathroom sink with running water, toilet, and bathtub/shower. Range of total items present is 0-7, with higher score suggesting higher housing quality in terms of infrastructure and appliances. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Housing quality: infrastructure and appliances [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing presence of a working stove/cooktop, refrigerator, kitchen sink, hot and cold water, bathroom sink with running water, toilet, and bathtub/shower. Range of total items present is 0-7, with higher score suggesting higher housing quality in terms of infrastructure and appliances. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Housing quality: infrastructure and appliances [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing presence of a working stove/cooktop, refrigerator, kitchen sink, hot and cold water, bathroom sink with running water, toilet, and bathtub/shower. Range of total items present is 0-7, with higher score suggesting higher housing quality in terms of infrastructure and appliances. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Time series analysis of housing quality: infrastructure and appliances [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 27 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing presence of a working stove/cooktop, refrigerator, kitchen sink, hot and cold water, bathroom sink with running water, toilet, and bathtub/shower. Range of total items present is 0-7, with higher score suggesting higher housing quality in terms of infrastructure and appliances. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Change in housing quality: infrastructure and appliances from baseline to 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements from baseline and at 24 months ]
Composite score assessing presence of a working stove/cooktop, refrigerator, kitchen sink, hot and cold water, bathroom sink with running water, toilet, and bathtub/shower. Range of total items present is 0-7, with higher score suggesting higher housing quality in terms of infrastructure and appliances. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Change in housing quality: infrastructure and appliances from baseline to 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements from baseline and at 36 months ]
Composite score assessing presence of a working stove/cooktop, refrigerator, kitchen sink, hot and cold water, bathroom sink with running water, toilet, and bathtub/shower. Range of total items present is 0-7, with higher score suggesting higher housing quality in terms of infrastructure and appliances. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Change in housing quality: infrastructure and appliances from 24 to 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements from 24 months and at 36 months ]
Composite score assessing presence of a working stove/cooktop, refrigerator, kitchen sink, hot and cold water, bathroom sink with running water, toilet, and bathtub/shower. Range of total items present is 0-7, with higher score suggesting higher housing quality in terms of infrastructure and appliances. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Housing quality: safety issues [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Composite score assessing presence of exposed electrical wiring (or lack thereof), mildew/water damage, flooring problems, holes/cracks, bad odors, bathroom plumbing problems, nonfunctioning toilet, electrical outages, lack of heating, rodents, cockroaches. Range of potential safety problems present is 0-11, with higher score suggesting worse housing safety. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Housing quality: safety issues [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing presence of exposed electrical wiring (or lack thereof), mildew/water damage, flooring problems, holes/cracks, bad odors, bathroom plumbing problems, nonfunctioning toilet, electrical outages, lack of heating, rodents, cockroaches. Range of potential safety problems present is 0-11, with higher score suggesting worse housing safety. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Housing quality: safety issues [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing presence of exposed electrical wiring (or lack thereof), mildew/water damage, flooring problems, holes/cracks, bad odors, bathroom plumbing problems, nonfunctioning toilet, electrical outages, lack of heating, rodents, cockroaches. Range of potential safety problems present is 0-11, with higher score suggesting worse housing safety. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Housing quality: safety issues [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing presence of exposed electrical wiring (or lack thereof), mildew/water damage, flooring problems, holes/cracks, bad odors, bathroom plumbing problems, nonfunctioning toilet, electrical outages, lack of heating, rodents, cockroaches. Range of potential safety problems present is 0-11, with higher score suggesting worse housing safety. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Housing quality: safety issues [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing presence of exposed electrical wiring (or lack thereof), mildew/water damage, flooring problems, holes/cracks, bad odors, bathroom plumbing problems, nonfunctioning toilet, electrical outages, lack of heating, rodents, cockroaches. Range of potential safety problems present is 0-11, with higher score suggesting worse housing safety. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Housing quality: safety issues [ Time Frame: 27 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing presence of exposed electrical wiring (or lack thereof), mildew/water damage, flooring problems, holes/cracks, bad odors, bathroom plumbing problems, nonfunctioning toilet, electrical outages, lack of heating, rodents, cockroaches. Range of potential safety problems present is 0-11, with higher score suggesting worse housing safety. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Housing quality: safety issues [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing presence of exposed electrical wiring (or lack thereof), mildew/water damage, flooring problems, holes/cracks, bad odors, bathroom plumbing problems, nonfunctioning toilet, electrical outages, lack of heating, rodents, cockroaches. Range of potential safety problems present is 0-11, with higher score suggesting worse housing safety. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Housing quality: safety issues [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing presence of exposed electrical wiring (or lack thereof), mildew/water damage, flooring problems, holes/cracks, bad odors, bathroom plumbing problems, nonfunctioning toilet, electrical outages, lack of heating, rodents, cockroaches. Range of potential safety problems present is 0-11, with higher score suggesting worse housing safety. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Time series analysis of housing quality: safety issues [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 27 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing presence of exposed electrical wiring (or lack thereof), mildew/water damage, flooring problems, holes/cracks, bad odors, bathroom plumbing problems, nonfunctioning toilet, electrical outages, lack of heating, rodents, cockroaches. Range of potential safety problems present is 0-11, with higher score suggesting worse housing safety. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Change in housing quality: safety issues from baseline to 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and at 24 months ]
Composite score assessing presence of exposed electrical wiring (or lack thereof), mildew/water damage, flooring problems, holes/cracks, bad odors, bathroom plumbing problems, nonfunctioning toilet, electrical outages, lack of heating, rodents, cockroaches. Range of potential safety problems present is 0-11, with higher score suggesting worse housing safety. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Change in housing quality: safety issues from baseline to 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and at 36 months ]
Composite score assessing presence of exposed electrical wiring (or lack thereof), mildew/water damage, flooring problems, holes/cracks, bad odors, bathroom plumbing problems, nonfunctioning toilet, electrical outages, lack of heating, rodents, cockroaches. Range of potential safety problems present is 0-11, with higher score suggesting worse housing safety. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Change in housing quality: safety issues from 24 to 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at 24 and 36 months ]
Composite score assessing presence of exposed electrical wiring (or lack thereof), mildew/water damage, flooring problems, holes/cracks, bad odors, bathroom plumbing problems, nonfunctioning toilet, electrical outages, lack of heating, rodents, cockroaches. Range of potential safety problems present is 0-11, with higher score suggesting worse housing safety. Adapted from composite measures of material hardship from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
Financial well-being [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Measured through the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Financial Well-Being survey. The ten items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale with each answer scored 0-4. A raw score is calculated from the sum of the ten items (range 0-40); the raw score is converted to a financial well-being score with adjustments for age and mode of survey administration. The range of financial well-being scores in adults 18 and older is 16-91 with higher scores corresponding to higher financial well-being.
Financial well-being [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Financial Well-Being survey. The ten items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale with each answer scored 0-4. A raw score is calculated from the sum of the ten items (range 0-40); the raw score is converted to a financial well-being score with adjustments for age and mode of survey administration. The range of financial well-being scores in adults 18 and older is 16-91 with higher scores corresponding to higher financial well-being.
Financial well-being [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Financial Well-Being survey. The ten items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale with each answer scored 0-4. A raw score is calculated from the sum of the ten items (range 0-40); the raw score is converted to a financial well-being score with adjustments for age and mode of survey administration. The range of financial well-being scores in adults 18 and older is 16-91 with higher scores corresponding to higher financial well-being.
Financial well-being [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Financial Well-Being survey. The ten items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale with each answer scored 0-4. A raw score is calculated from the sum of the ten items (range 0-40); the raw score is converted to a financial well-being score with adjustments for age and mode of survey administration. The range of financial well-being scores in adults 18 and older is 16-91 with higher scores corresponding to higher financial well-being.
Financial well-being [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Financial Well-Being survey. The ten items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale with each answer scored 0-4. A raw score is calculated from the sum of the ten items (range 0-40); the raw score is converted to a financial well-being score with adjustments for age and mode of survey administration. The range of financial well-being scores in adults 18 and older is 16-91 with higher scores corresponding to higher financial well-being.
Financial well-being [ Time Frame: 27 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Financial Well-Being survey. The ten items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale with each answer scored 0-4. A raw score is calculated from the sum of the ten items (range 0-40); the raw score is converted to a financial well-being score with adjustments for age and mode of survey administration. The range of financial well-being scores in adults 18 and older is 16-91 with higher scores corresponding to higher financial well-being.
Financial well-being [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Financial Well-Being survey. The ten items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale with each answer scored 0-4. A raw score is calculated from the sum of the ten items (range 0-40); the raw score is converted to a financial well-being score with adjustments for age and mode of survey administration. The range of financial well-being scores in adults 18 and older is 16-91 with higher scores corresponding to higher financial well-being.
Financial well-being [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Financial Well-Being survey. The ten items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale with each answer scored 0-4. A raw score is calculated from the sum of the ten items (range 0-40); the raw score is converted to a financial well-being score with adjustments for age and mode of survey administration. The range of financial well-being scores in adults 18 and older is 16-91 with higher scores corresponding to higher financial well-being.
Time series analysis of financial well-being [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 27 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Financial Well-Being survey. The ten items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale with each answer scored 0-4. A raw score is calculated from the sum of the ten items (range 0-40); the raw score is converted to a financial well-being score with adjustments for age and mode of survey administration. The range of financial well-being scores in adults 18 and older is 16-91 with higher scores corresponding to higher financial well-being.
Change in financial well-being from baseline to 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 24 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Financial Well-Being survey. The ten items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale with each answer scored 0-4. A raw score is calculated from the sum of the ten items (range 0-40); the raw score is converted to a financial well-being score with adjustments for age and mode of survey administration. The range of financial well-being scores in adults 18 and older is 16-91 with higher scores corresponding to higher financial well-being.
Change in financial well-being from baseline to 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Financial Well-Being survey. The ten items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale with each answer scored 0-4. A raw score is calculated from the sum of the ten items (range 0-40); the raw score is converted to a financial well-being score with adjustments for age and mode of survey administration. The range of financial well-being scores in adults 18 and older is 16-91 with higher scores corresponding to higher financial well-being.
Change in financial well-being from 24 to 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at 24 and 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Financial Well-Being survey. The ten items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale with each answer scored 0-4. A raw score is calculated from the sum of the ten items (range 0-40); the raw score is converted to a financial well-being score with adjustments for age and mode of survey administration. The range of financial well-being scores in adults 18 and older is 16-91 with higher scores corresponding to higher financial well-being.
Financial well-being (emergency expenses) [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $400 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED).
Financial well-being (emergency expenses) [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $400 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED).
Financial well-being (emergency expenses) [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $400 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED).
Financial well-being (emergency expenses) [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $400 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED).
Financial well-being (emergency expenses) [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $400 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED).
Financial well-being (emergency expenses) [ Time Frame: 27 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $400 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED).
Financial well-being (emergency expenses) [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $400 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED).
Financial well-being (emergency expenses) [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $400 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED).
Time series analysis of financial well-being (emergency expenses) [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 27 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $400 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED).
Change in financial well-being (emergency expenses) at baseline vs 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 24 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $400 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED).
Change in financial well-being (emergency expenses) at baseline vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $400 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED).
Change in financial well-being (emergency expenses) at 24 vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at 24 and 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $400 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED).
Financial well-being (larger emergency expenses) [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $2000 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED) and Urban Institute Survey of Well-Being and Basic Needs. This question is asked only of the subset of households who respond they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very’ confident they could handle a $400 expense in the next month.
Financial well-being (larger emergency expenses) [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $2000 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED) and Urban Institute Survey of Well-Being and Basic Needs. This question is asked only of the subset of households who respond they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very’ confident they could handle a $400 expense in the next month.
Financial well-being (larger emergency expenses) [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $2000 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED) and Urban Institute Survey of Well-Being and Basic Needs. This question is asked only of the subset of households who respond they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very’ confident they could handle a $400 expense in the next month.
Financial well-being (larger emergency expenses) [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $2000 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED) and Urban Institute Survey of Well-Being and Basic Needs. This question is asked only of the subset of households who respond they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very’ confident they could handle a $400 expense in the next month.
Financial well-being (larger emergency expenses) [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $2000 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED) and Urban Institute Survey of Well-Being and Basic Needs. This question is asked only of the subset of households who respond they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very’ confident they could handle a $400 expense in the next month.
Financial well-being (larger emergency expenses) [ Time Frame: 27 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $2000 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED) and Urban Institute Survey of Well-Being and Basic Needs. This question is asked only of the subset of households who respond they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very’ confident they could handle a $400 expense in the next month.
Financial well-being (larger emergency expenses) [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $2000 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED) and Urban Institute Survey of Well-Being and Basic Needs. This question is asked only of the subset of households who respond they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very’ confident they could handle a $400 expense in the next month.
Financial well-being (larger emergency expenses) [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $2000 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED) and Urban Institute Survey of Well-Being and Basic Needs. This question is asked only of the subset of households who respond they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very’ confident they could handle a $400 expense in the next month.
Time series analysis of financial well-being (larger emergency expenses) [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 27 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $2000 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED) and Urban Institute Survey of Well-Being and Basic Needs. This question is asked only of the subset of households who respond they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very’ confident they could handle a $400 expense in the next month.
Change in financial well-being (larger emergency expenses) at baseline vs 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 24 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $2000 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED) and Urban Institute Survey of Well-Being and Basic Needs. This question is asked only of the subset of households who respond they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very’ confident they could handle a $400 expense in the next month.
Change in financial well-being (larger emergency expenses) at baseline vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $2000 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED) and Urban Institute Survey of Well-Being and Basic Needs. This question is asked only of the subset of households who respond they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very’ confident they could handle a $400 expense in the next month.
Change in financial well-being (larger emergency expenses) at 24 vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at 24 and 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very confident’ they could handle a $2000 emergency expense in the next month. Adapted from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (or SHED) and Urban Institute Survey of Well-Being and Basic Needs. This question is asked only of the subset of households who respond they are ‘somewhat’ or ‘very’ confident they could handle a $400 expense in the next month.
Financial well-being (monthly finances) [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they have ‘just enough money to make ends meet’ or ‘some money left over’ at the end of each month, as an indicator of stable monthly finances. Adapted from the Family Options Study.
Financial well-being (monthly finances) [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they have ‘just enough money to make ends meet’ or ‘some money left over’ at the end of each month, as an indicator of stable monthly finances. Adapted from the Family Options Study.
Financial well-being (monthly finances) [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they have ‘just enough money to make ends meet’ or ‘some money left over’ at the end of each month, as an indicator of stable monthly finances. Adapted from the Family Options Study.
Financial well-being (monthly finances) [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they have ‘just enough money to make ends meet’ or ‘some money left over’ at the end of each month, as an indicator of stable monthly finances. Adapted from the Family Options Study.
Financial well-being (monthly finances) [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they have ‘just enough money to make ends meet’ or ‘some money left over’ at the end of each month, as an indicator of stable monthly finances. Adapted from the Family Options Study.
Financial well-being (monthly finances) [ Time Frame: 27 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they have ‘just enough money to make ends meet’ or ‘some money left over’ at the end of each month, as an indicator of stable monthly finances. Adapted from the Family Options Study.
Financial well-being (monthly finances) [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they have ‘just enough money to make ends meet’ or ‘some money left over’ at the end of each month, as an indicator of stable monthly finances. Adapted from the Family Options Study.
Financial well-being (monthly finances) [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they have ‘just enough money to make ends meet’ or ‘some money left over’ at the end of each month, as an indicator of stable monthly finances. Adapted from the Family Options Study.
Time series analysis of financial well-being (monthly finances) [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 27 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they have ‘just enough money to make ends meet’ or ‘some money left over’ at the end of each month, as an indicator of stable monthly finances. Adapted from the Family Options Study.
Change in financial well-being (monthly finances) at baseline vs 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 24 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they have ‘just enough money to make ends meet’ or ‘some money left over’ at the end of each month, as an indicator of stable monthly finances. Adapted from the Family Options Study.
Change in financial well-being (monthly finances) at baseline vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they have ‘just enough money to make ends meet’ or ‘some money left over’ at the end of each month, as an indicator of stable monthly finances. Adapted from the Family Options Study.
Change in financial well-being (monthly finances) at 24 vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at 24 and 36 months after randomization ]
Measured through proportion of families responding they have ‘just enough money to make ends meet’ or ‘some money left over’ at the end of each month, as an indicator of stable monthly finances. Adapted from the Family Options Study.
Material hardship [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Composite score assessing the presence of: use of payday loan, overdrawn checking account, missed credit card payment, missed loan payment, contacted by a debt collection agency, late gas/electric bill payment, gas/electricity turned off due to non-payment, late phone bill payment, phone service turned off due to non-payment, difficulty paying medical bills, late rent/mortgage payment, and partial rent/mortgage payment. Range of material hardship domains is 0-11 with higher score associated with material hardship. Individual items are adapted from questions from the Survey of Income and Program Participation and the Urban Institute Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey.
Material hardship [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing the presence of: use of payday loan, overdrawn checking account, missed credit card payment, missed loan payment, contacted by a debt collection agency, late gas/electric bill payment, gas/electricity turned off due to non-payment, late phone bill payment, phone service turned off due to non-payment, difficulty paying medical bills, late rent/mortgage payment, and partial rent/mortgage payment. Range of material hardship domains is 0-11 with higher score associated with material hardship. Individual items are adapted from questions from the Survey of Income and Program Participation and the Urban Institute Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey.
Material hardship [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing the presence of: use of payday loan, overdrawn checking account, missed credit card payment, missed loan payment, contacted by a debt collection agency, late gas/electric bill payment, gas/electricity turned off due to non-payment, late phone bill payment, phone service turned off due to non-payment, difficulty paying medical bills, late rent/mortgage payment, and partial rent/mortgage payment. Range of material hardship domains is 0-11 with higher score associated with material hardship. Individual items are adapted from questions from the Survey of Income and Program Participation and the Urban Institute Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey.
Material hardship [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing the presence of: use of payday loan, overdrawn checking account, missed credit card payment, missed loan payment, contacted by a debt collection agency, late gas/electric bill payment, gas/electricity turned off due to non-payment, late phone bill payment, phone service turned off due to non-payment, difficulty paying medical bills, late rent/mortgage payment, and partial rent/mortgage payment. Range of material hardship domains is 0-11 with higher score associated with material hardship. Individual items are adapted from questions from the Survey of Income and Program Participation and the Urban Institute Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey.
Material hardship [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing the presence of: use of payday loan, overdrawn checking account, missed credit card payment, missed loan payment, contacted by a debt collection agency, late gas/electric bill payment, gas/electricity turned off due to non-payment, late phone bill payment, phone service turned off due to non-payment, difficulty paying medical bills, late rent/mortgage payment, and partial rent/mortgage payment. Range of material hardship domains is 0-11 with higher score associated with material hardship. Individual items are adapted from questions from the Survey of Income and Program Participation and the Urban Institute Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey.
Material hardship [ Time Frame: 27 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing the presence of: use of payday loan, overdrawn checking account, missed credit card payment, missed loan payment, contacted by a debt collection agency, late gas/electric bill payment, gas/electricity turned off due to non-payment, late phone bill payment, phone service turned off due to non-payment, difficulty paying medical bills, late rent/mortgage payment, and partial rent/mortgage payment. Range of material hardship domains is 0-11 with higher score associated with material hardship. Individual items are adapted from questions from the Survey of Income and Program Participation and the Urban Institute Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey.
Material hardship [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing the presence of: use of payday loan, overdrawn checking account, missed credit card payment, missed loan payment, contacted by a debt collection agency, late gas/electric bill payment, gas/electricity turned off due to non-payment, late phone bill payment, phone service turned off due to non-payment, difficulty paying medical bills, late rent/mortgage payment, and partial rent/mortgage payment. Range of material hardship domains is 0-11 with higher score associated with material hardship. Individual items are adapted from questions from the Survey of Income and Program Participation and the Urban Institute Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey.
Material hardship [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Composite score assessing the presence of: use of payday loan, overdrawn checking account, missed credit card payment, missed loan payment, contacted by a debt collection agency, late gas/electric bill payment, gas/electricity turned off due to non-payment, late phone bill payment, phone service turned off due to non-payment, difficulty paying medical bills, late rent/mortgage payment, and partial rent/mortgage payment. Range of material hardship domains is 0-11 with higher score associated with material hardship. Individual items are adapted from questions from the Survey of Income and Program Participation and the Urban Institute Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey.
Time series analysis of material hardship [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 27 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Change over time in composite score assessing the presence of: use of payday loan, overdrawn checking account, missed credit card payment, missed loan payment, contacted by a debt collection agency, late gas/electric bill payment, gas/electricity turned off due to non-payment, late phone bill payment, phone service turned off due to non-payment, difficulty paying medical bills, late rent/mortgage payment, and partial rent/mortgage payment. Range of material hardship domains is 0-11 with higher score associated with material hardship. Individual items are adapted from questions from the Survey of Income and Program Participation and the Urban Institute Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey.
Change in material hardship from baseline to 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 24 months after randomization ]
Change in composite score assessing the presence of: use of payday loan, overdrawn checking account, missed credit card payment, missed loan payment, contacted by a debt collection agency, late gas/electric bill payment, gas/electricity turned off due to non-payment, late phone bill payment, phone service turned off due to non-payment, difficulty paying medical bills, late rent/mortgage payment, and partial rent/mortgage payment. Range of material hardship domains is 0-11 with higher score associated with material hardship. Individual items are adapted from questions from the Survey of Income and Program Participation and the Urban Institute Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey.
Change in material hardship from baseline to 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 36 months after randomization ]
Change in composite score assessing the presence of: use of payday loan, overdrawn checking account, missed credit card payment, missed loan payment, contacted by a debt collection agency, late gas/electric bill payment, gas/electricity turned off due to non-payment, late phone bill payment, phone service turned off due to non-payment, difficulty paying medical bills, late rent/mortgage payment, and partial rent/mortgage payment. Range of material hardship domains is 0-11 with higher score associated with material hardship. Individual items are adapted from questions from the Survey of Income and Program Participation and the Urban Institute Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey.
Change in material hardship from 24 to 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at 24 and 36 months after randomization ]
Change in composite score assessing the presence of: use of payday loan, overdrawn checking account, missed credit card payment, missed loan payment, contacted by a debt collection agency, late gas/electric bill payment, gas/electricity turned off due to non-payment, late phone bill payment, phone service turned off due to non-payment, difficulty paying medical bills, late rent/mortgage payment, and partial rent/mortgage payment. Range of material hardship domains is 0-11 with higher score associated with material hardship. Individual items are adapted from questions from the Survey of Income and Program Participation and the Urban Institute Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey.
Total debt to monthly income ratio [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Sum of total debt (composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage) divided by reported average monthly income. A higher ratio indicates a higher burden of debt relative to monthly income.
Total debt to monthly income ratio [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Sum of total debt (composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage) divided by reported average monthly income. A higher ratio indicates a higher burden of debt relative to monthly income.
Total debt to monthly income ratio [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Sum of total debt (composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage) divided by reported average monthly income. A higher ratio indicates a higher burden of debt relative to monthly income.
Total debt to monthly income ratio [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Sum of total debt (composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage) divided by reported average monthly income. A higher ratio indicates a higher burden of debt relative to monthly income.
Total debt to monthly income ratio [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Sum of total debt (composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage) divided by reported average monthly income. A higher ratio indicates a higher burden of debt relative to monthly income.
Total debt to monthly income ratio [ Time Frame: 27 months after randomization ]
Sum of total debt (composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage) divided by reported average monthly income. A higher ratio indicates a higher burden of debt relative to monthly income.
Total debt to monthly income ratio [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Sum of total debt (composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage) divided by reported average monthly income. A higher ratio indicates a higher burden of debt relative to monthly income.
Total debt to monthly income ratio [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Sum of total debt (composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage) divided by reported average monthly income. A higher ratio indicates a higher burden of debt relative to monthly income.
Time series analysis of total debt to monthly income ratio [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 27 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Sum of total debt (composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage) divided by reported average monthly income. A higher ratio indicates a higher burden of debt relative to monthly income.
Change in total debt to monthly income ratio at baseline vs 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 24 months after randomization ]
Sum of total debt (composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage) divided by reported average monthly income. A higher ratio indicates a higher burden of debt relative to monthly income.
Change in total debt to monthly income ratio at baseline vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 36 months after randomization ]
Sum of total debt (composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage) divided by reported average monthly income. A higher ratio indicates a higher burden of debt relative to monthly income.
Change in total debt to monthly income ratio at 24 vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at 24 and 36 months after randomization ]
Sum of total debt (composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage) divided by reported average monthly income. A higher ratio indicates a higher burden of debt relative to monthly income.
Total debt [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Total self-reported debt (dollar amount, composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage). A higher amount indicates a higher burden of debt.
Total debt [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
Total self-reported debt (dollar amount, composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage). A higher amount indicates a higher burden of debt.
Total debt [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
Total self-reported debt (dollar amount, composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage). A higher amount indicates a higher burden of debt.
Total debt [ Time Frame: 18 months ]
Total self-reported debt (dollar amount, composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage). A higher amount indicates a higher burden of debt.
Total debt [ Time Frame: 24 months ]
Total self-reported debt (dollar amount, composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage). A higher amount indicates a higher burden of debt.
Total debt [ Time Frame: 27 months ]
Total self-reported debt (dollar amount, composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage). A higher amount indicates a higher burden of debt.
Total debt [ Time Frame: 30 months ]
Total self-reported debt (dollar amount, composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage). A higher amount indicates a higher burden of debt.
Total debt [ Time Frame: 36 months ]
Total self-reported debt (dollar amount, composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage). A higher amount indicates a higher burden of debt.
Time series analysis of total debt [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 27 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Total self-reported debt (dollar amount, composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage). A higher amount indicates a higher burden of debt.
Change in total debt at baseline vs 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 24 months after randomization ]
Total self-reported debt (dollar amount, composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage). A higher amount indicates a higher burden of debt.
Change in total debt at baseline vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 36 months after randomization ]
Total self-reported debt (dollar amount, composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage). A higher amount indicates a higher burden of debt.
Change in total debt at 24 vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at 24 and 36 months after randomization ]
Total self-reported debt (dollar amount, composite of balance of loans/credit card debt, balance for overdue bills, and balance for overdue rent/mortgage). A higher amount indicates a higher burden of debt.
Household food security [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module: Six-Item Short Form. Responses to each of the six items are coded as ‘affirmative’ or ‘negative’, with each affirmative response assigned a score of 1. Scores are summed across the six items to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating lower household food security.
Household food security [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module: Six-Item Short Form. Responses to each of the six items are coded as ‘affirmative’ or ‘negative’, with each affirmative response assigned a score of 1. Scores are summed across the six items to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating lower household food security.
Household food security [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module: Six-Item Short Form. Responses to each of the six items are coded as ‘affirmative’ or ‘negative’, with each affirmative response assigned a score of 1. Scores are summed across the six items to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating lower household food security.
Household food security [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module: Six-Item Short Form. Responses to each of the six items are coded as ‘affirmative’ or ‘negative’, with each affirmative response assigned a score of 1. Scores are summed across the six items to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating lower household food security.
Household food security [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module: Six-Item Short Form. Responses to each of the six items are coded as ‘affirmative’ or ‘negative’, with each affirmative response assigned a score of 1. Scores are summed across the six items to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating lower household food security.
Household food security [ Time Frame: 27 months after randomization ]
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module: Six-Item Short Form. Responses to each of the six items are coded as ‘affirmative’ or ‘negative’, with each affirmative response assigned a score of 1. Scores are summed across the six items to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating lower household food security.
Household food security [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module: Six-Item Short Form. Responses to each of the six items are coded as ‘affirmative’ or ‘negative’, with each affirmative response assigned a score of 1. Scores are summed across the six items to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating lower household food security.
Household food security [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module: Six-Item Short Form. Responses to each of the six items are coded as ‘affirmative’ or ‘negative’, with each affirmative response assigned a score of 1. Scores are summed across the six items to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating lower household food security.
Time series analysis of household food security [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module: Six-Item Short Form. Responses to each of the six items are coded as ‘affirmative’ or ‘negative’, with each affirmative response assigned a score of 1. Scores are summed across the six items to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating lower household food security.
Change in household food security from baseline to 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 24 months after randomization ]
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module: Six-Item Short Form. Responses to each of the six items are coded as ‘affirmative’ or ‘negative’, with each affirmative response assigned a score of 1. Scores are summed across the six items to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating lower household food security.
Change in household food security from baseline to 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 36 months after randomization ]
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module: Six-Item Short Form. Responses to each of the six items are coded as ‘affirmative’ or ‘negative’, with each affirmative response assigned a score of 1. Scores are summed across the six items to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating lower household food security.
Change in household food security from 24 to 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at 24 and 36 months after randomization ]
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module: Six-Item Short Form. Responses to each of the six items are coded as ‘affirmative’ or ‘negative’, with each affirmative response assigned a score of 1. Scores are summed across the six items to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating lower household food security.
Self-efficacy [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE). Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale; the total score is calculated by finding the sum of all items (range 6-24) with a higher score indicating greater self-efficacy
Self-efficacy [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE). Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale; the total score is calculated by finding the sum of all items (range 6-24) with a higher score indicating greater self-efficacy
Self-efficacy [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE). Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale; the total score is calculated by finding the sum of all items (range 6-24) with a higher score indicating greater self-efficacy
Self-efficacy [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE). Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale; the total score is calculated by finding the sum of all items (range 6-24) with a higher score indicating greater self-efficacy
Self-efficacy [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE). Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale; the total score is calculated by finding the sum of all items (range 6-24) with a higher score indicating greater self-efficacy
Self-efficacy [ Time Frame: 27 months after randomization ]
General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE). Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale; the total score is calculated by finding the sum of all items (range 6-24) with a higher score indicating greater self-efficacy
Self-efficacy [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE). Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale; the total score is calculated by finding the sum of all items (range 6-24) with a higher score indicating greater self-efficacy
Self-efficacy [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE). Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale; the total score is calculated by finding the sum of all items (range 6-24) with a higher score indicating greater self-efficacy
Time series analysis of self-efficacy [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE). Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale; the total score is calculated by finding the sum of all items (range 6-24) with a higher score indicating greater self-efficacy
Change in self-efficacy at baseline vs 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 24 months after randomization ]
General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE). Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale; the total score is calculated by finding the sum of all items (range 6-24) with a higher score indicating greater self-efficacy
Change in self-efficacy at baseline vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 36 months after randomization ]
General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE). Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale; the total score is calculated by finding the sum of all items (range 6-24) with a higher score indicating greater self-efficacy
Change in self-efficacy at 24 vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at 24 and 36 months after randomization ]
General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE). Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale; the total score is calculated by finding the sum of all items (range 6-24) with a higher score indicating greater self-efficacy
Resilience [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items divided by 6 (range 1-5). Higher scores indicate more resilience.
Resilience [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items divided by 6 (range 1-5). Higher scores indicate more resilience.
Resilience [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items divided by 6 (range 1-5). Higher scores indicate more resilience.
Resilience [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items divided by 6 (range 1-5). Higher scores indicate more resilience.
Resilience [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items divided by 6 (range 1-5). Higher scores indicate more resilience.
Resilience [ Time Frame: 27 months after randomization ]
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items divided by 6 (range 1-5). Higher scores indicate more resilience.
Resilience [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items divided by 6 (range 1-5). Higher scores indicate more resilience.
Resilience [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items divided by 6 (range 1-5). Higher scores indicate more resilience.
Time series analysis of resilience [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items divided by 6 (range 1-5). Higher scores indicate more resilience.
Change in resilience from baseline vs 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 24 months after randomization ]
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items divided by 6 (range 1-5). Higher scores indicate more resilience.
Change in resilience from baseline vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 36 months after randomization ]
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items divided by 6 (range 1-5). Higher scores indicate more resilience.
Change in resilience from 24 vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at 24 and 36 months after randomization ]
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items divided by 6 (range 1-5). Higher scores indicate more resilience.
Perceived stress [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 0-16), with higher scores correlating to more stress
Perceived stress [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 0-16), with higher scores correlating to more stress
Perceived stress [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 0-16), with higher scores correlating to more stress
Perceived stress [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 0-16), with higher scores correlating to more stress
Perceived stress [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 0-16), with higher scores correlating to more stress
Perceived stress [ Time Frame: 27 months after randomization ]
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 0-16), with higher scores correlating to more stress
Perceived stress [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 0-16), with higher scores correlating to more stress
Perceived stress [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 0-16), with higher scores correlating to more stress
Time series analysis of perceived stress [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 0-16), with higher scores correlating to more stress
Change in perceived stress at baseline vs 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 24 months after randomization ]
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 0-16), with higher scores correlating to more stress
Change in perceived stress at baseline vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 36 months after randomization ]
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 0-16), with higher scores correlating to more stress
Change in perceived stress at 24 vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at 24 and 36 months after randomization ]
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 0-16), with higher scores correlating to more stress
Chaos, Hubbub and Order Scale (CHAOS) [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Validated measure of household environment. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6-30) with higher scores corresponding to higher household chaos.
Chaos, Hubbub and Order Scale (CHAOS) [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Validated measure of household environment. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6-30) with higher scores corresponding to higher household chaos.
Chaos, Hubbub and Order Scale (CHAOS) [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Validated measure of household environment. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6-30) with higher scores corresponding to higher household chaos.
Chaos, Hubbub and Order Scale (CHAOS) [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Validated measure of household environment. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6-30) with higher scores corresponding to higher household chaos.
Chaos, Hubbub and Order Scale (CHAOS) [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Validated measure of household environment. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6-30) with higher scores corresponding to higher household chaos.
Chaos, Hubbub and Order Scale (CHAOS) [ Time Frame: 27 months after randomization ]
Validated measure of household environment. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6-30) with higher scores corresponding to higher household chaos.
Chaos, Hubbub and Order Scale (CHAOS) [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Validated measure of household environment. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6-30) with higher scores corresponding to higher household chaos.
Chaos, Hubbub and Order Scale (CHAOS) [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Validated measure of household environment. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6-30) with higher scores corresponding to higher household chaos.
Time series analysis of Chaos, Hubbub and Order Scale (CHAOS) [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Validated measure of household environment. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6-30) with higher scores corresponding to higher household chaos.
Change in Chaos, Hubbub and Order Scale (CHAOS) at baseline vs 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 24 months after randomization ]
Validated measure of household environment. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6-30) with higher scores corresponding to higher household chaos.
Change in Chaos, Hubbub and Order Scale (CHAOS) at baseline vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 36 months after randomization ]
Validated measure of household environment. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6-30) with higher scores corresponding to higher household chaos.
Change in Chaos, Hubbub and Order Scale (CHAOS) at 24 vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at 24 and 36 months after randomization ]
Validated measure of household environment. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6-30) with higher scores corresponding to higher household chaos.
Agency [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Adult State Hope Scale (modified from the Future Scale). Items are scored from 1-8. The total hope score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6 to 48) with higher scores representing higher hope levels. The agency sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 2, 4, 6 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of agency thinking. The pathways sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 1, 3, and 5 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of pathways thinking.
Agency [ Time Frame: 6 months after randomization ]
Adult State Hope Scale (modified from the Future Scale). Items are scored from 1-8. The total hope score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6 to 48) with higher scores representing higher hope levels. The agency sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 2, 4, 6 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of agency thinking. The pathways sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 1, 3, and 5 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of pathways thinking.
Agency [ Time Frame: 12 months after randomization ]
Adult State Hope Scale (modified from the Future Scale). Items are scored from 1-8. The total hope score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6 to 48) with higher scores representing higher hope levels. The agency sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 2, 4, 6 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of agency thinking. The pathways sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 1, 3, and 5 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of pathways thinking.
Agency [ Time Frame: 18 months after randomization ]
Adult State Hope Scale (modified from the Future Scale). Items are scored from 1-8. The total hope score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6 to 48) with higher scores representing higher hope levels. The agency sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 2, 4, 6 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of agency thinking. The pathways sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 1, 3, and 5 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of pathways thinking.
Agency [ Time Frame: 24 months after randomization ]
Adult State Hope Scale (modified from the Future Scale). Items are scored from 1-8. The total hope score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6 to 48) with higher scores representing higher hope levels. The agency sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 2, 4, 6 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of agency thinking. The pathways sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 1, 3, and 5 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of pathways thinking.
Agency [ Time Frame: 27 months after randomization ]
Adult State Hope Scale (modified from the Future Scale). Items are scored from 1-8. The total hope score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6 to 48) with higher scores representing higher hope levels. The agency sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 2, 4, 6 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of agency thinking. The pathways sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 1, 3, and 5 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of pathways thinking.
Agency [ Time Frame: 30 months after randomization ]
Adult State Hope Scale (modified from the Future Scale). Items are scored from 1-8. The total hope score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6 to 48) with higher scores representing higher hope levels. The agency sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 2, 4, 6 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of agency thinking. The pathways sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 1, 3, and 5 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of pathways thinking.
Agency [ Time Frame: 36 months after randomization ]
Adult State Hope Scale (modified from the Future Scale). Items are scored from 1-8. The total hope score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6 to 48) with higher scores representing higher hope levels. The agency sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 2, 4, 6 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of agency thinking. The pathways sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 1, 3, and 5 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of pathways thinking.
Time series analysis of agency [ Time Frame: Times series will include measurements at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 27 months, 30 months, 36 months after randomization ]
Adult State Hope Scale (modified from the Future Scale). Items are scored from 1-8. The total hope score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6 to 48) with higher scores representing higher hope levels. The agency sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 2, 4, 6 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of agency thinking. The pathways sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 1, 3, and 5 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of pathways thinking.
Change in agency at baseline vs 24 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 24 months after randomization ]
Adult State Hope Scale (modified from the Future Scale). Items are scored from 1-8. The total hope score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6 to 48) with higher scores representing higher hope levels. The agency sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 2, 4, 6 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of agency thinking. The pathways sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 1, 3, and 5 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of pathways thinking.
Change in agency at baseline vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at baseline and 36 months after randomization ]
Adult State Hope Scale (modified from the Future Scale). Items are scored from 1-8. The total hope score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6 to 48) with higher scores representing higher hope levels. The agency sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 2, 4, 6 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of agency thinking. The pathways sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 1, 3, and 5 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of pathways thinking.
Change in agency at 24 vs 36 months [ Time Frame: Will include measurements at 24 and 36 months after randomization ]
Adult State Hope Scale (modified from the Future Scale). Items are scored from 1-8. The total hope score is calculated from the sum of all items (range 6 to 48) with higher scores representing higher hope levels. The agency sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 2, 4, 6 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of agency thinking. The pathways sub scale score is calculated from the sum of items 1, 3, and 5 (range 3 to 24) with higher scores indicating higher levels of pathways thinking.
Source: View full study details on ClinicalTrials.gov
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. By listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.