Prospective Study FNB, Is It Time To Abandon Cytological Assessment

Prospective Study FNB, Is It Time To Abandon Cytological Assessment

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04165018

Recruitment Status : **RECRUITING NOW**
First Posted : November 15, 2019
Last Update Posted : February 13, 2023

Sponsor:

Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Mohamed Othman, Baylor College of Medicine

Go to 

Brief Summary:
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) is a minimally invasive procedure used by gastroenterologists to examine pancreatic masses and lesions. A fine needle is traversed through an endoscope and used to acquire tissue samples, which are then sent for pathology. The standard approach for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions has been fine needle aspiration (FNA) (Han et al. 2016). However, the use of FNA comes with its limitations, some of which include multiple needle passes to acquire fluid, the need for on-site cytologists, and decreased diagnostic yield. Fine needle biopsy (FNB) is the latest approach being employed by endosonographers in lieu of FNA. FNB confers several advantages over FNB. First, FNB requires fewer needle passes than FNA to acquire tissue sample for immunohistochemical staining. In addition, FNB provides better tissues samples, greater sensitivity of the tissue core, and thus, improved diagnostic yields (Tian et al. 2018). Finally, FNB is more cost-effective than FNA and relies on pathologists, instead of on-site cytologists, and preserves the tissue core (Tian et al. 2018). The objective of this study is to establish a database of samples placed in formalin for patients who will undergo a fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for pathological evaluation without rapid on site cytological assessment.

Pancreatic Neoplasms
Procedure: Fine-Needle Biopsy (FNB)

Go to 

Layout table for study information

Study Type :
Observational [Patient Registry]

Estimated Enrollment :
200 participants

Observational Model:
Cohort

Time Perspective:
Prospective

Target Follow-Up Duration:
48 Weeks

Official Title:
Prospective Study FNB, Is It Time To Abandon Cytological Assessment (FACET)

Actual Study Start Date :
April 9, 2021

Estimated Primary Completion Date :
September 2023

Estimated Study Completion Date :
December 2023

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

Go to 

Intervention Details:

Go to 

Primary Outcome Measures :

Sensitivity and Specificity using FNB sampling pancreatic mass [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
% of core tissue obtained, number of needle passes made, and assessment of any procedure related adverse events

Diagnostic yield between FNB samples placed in formalin for pathology evaluation from two different types of needle [ Time Frame: 2 years ]

Secondary Outcome Measures :

Rate of adverse events of utilizing the FNB technique, including pancreatitis, bleeding, or perforation [ Time Frame: 2 years ]

Biospecimen Retention:   Samples Without DNAPancreatic mass biopsy for pathological evaluation

Go to 

Information from the National Library of Medicine
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.

Layout table for eligibility information

Ages Eligible for Study:  
18 Years to 100 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)

Sexes Eligible for Study:  
All

Sampling Method:  
Non-Probability Sample

Patients referred to EUS-FNB for pancreatic mass lesions

Inclusion Criteria:

Patient is greater than or equal to 18 years of age
Patient is referred to EUS-FNB for pancreatic mass lesions

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient is younger than 18 years of age
Patient refused and/or unable to provide consent
Patient is a pregnant woman

Go to 

Information from the National Library of Medicine
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04165018

Layout table for location information

Baylor College of Medicine

Houston, Texas, United States, 77030

Contact: Mohamed O. Othman, MD    713-798-0950    Mohamed.Othman@bcm.edu   

Baylor St. Lukes Medical Center (BSLMC)

Houston, Texas, United States, 77030

Contact: Mohamed O. Othman, MD    713-798-0950    Mohamed.Othman@bcm.edu   

Contact: Michael Mercado    7137983606    Michael.Mercado@bcm.edu   

Baylor College of Medicine

Go to 

Layout table for additonal information

Responsible Party:
Mohamed Othman, Principal Investigator, Baylor College of Medicine

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04165018    

Other Study ID Numbers:
H-44963

First Posted:
November 15, 2019    Key Record Dates

Last Update Posted:
February 13, 2023

Last Verified:
February 2023

Layout table for additional information

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No

Keywords provided by Mohamed Othman, Baylor College of Medicine:

Pancreatic masses and lesions

Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Layout table for MeSH terms

Pancreatic NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasms
Endocrine Gland NeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesPancreatic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Source: View full study details on ClinicalTrials.gov

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. By listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.

February 14, 2023Comments OffClinicalTrials.gov | Endocrinology Clinical Trials | Endocrinology Studies | US National Library of Medicine
Comments