Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is an epidemic in the United States, affecting 30.2 million people. Vascular complications of T2D (heart and kidney disease, stroke, retinopathy, and amputation) are associated with poor glycemic control. However, the results of recent clinical trials (ACCORD, ADVANCE, VADT) to aggressively reduce HbA1c with medications have not resulted in cardiovascular benefits and may even be harmful due to risks of polypharmacy. Although HbA1c is directly associated with vascular complications, there is growing evidence that glycemic variability (or GV, defined by postprandial excursions and hypoglycemic nadirs) may be a better treatment target.
Postprandial glycemic excursions are primarily driven by diet. However, the results of dietary intervention studies intended to control postprandial excursions in T2D patients have been mixed and mostly negative. Importantly, these studies used one-size-fits-all dietary strategies that did not consider the fact that individuals vary greatly in their glycemic response to same foods. One-size-fits-all approaches are frustrating to T2D patients who have glycemic excursions despite their best efforts. And failure to adequately manage glycemia in the early stages of the disease has long-term vascular consequences that are not entirely remedied by subsequent, better glycemic control.
Personalized medicine is defined as “the right treatment for the right person at the right time” and has grown out of dramatic advances in genetic testing, molecular profiling, and mobile health (mHealth) technology. Personalizing dietary recommendations to the patient’s unique glycemic response to food, using an algorithm derived from the gut microbiome to predict postprandial glycemic response (PPGR), is a proactive approach to early T2D dietary management that could increase mastery and self-management success beyond what can be achieved through a one-size-fits-all diet. The investigators also argue that such an approach could reduce glycemic exposure, preserve β-cell function, and reduce downstream metabolic consequences of T2D.
The purpose of this clinical trial is to determine the efficacy of a Personalized behavioral approach for dietary management of early-stage T2D, versus a Standardized behavioral intervention (which uses one-size-fits-all dietary recommendations), versus a UCC.
Primary aims. Compared to UCC, the study will determine the incremental benefits of Standardized and Personalized interventions on mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (or MAGE, the most frequently used measure of GV).
Hypothesis 1: MAGE-Personalized< MAGE-Standardized < MAGE-UCC at 6 months.
Secondary aim. At each time point, the study will describe the impact of the intervention on HbA1c.
Exploratory aims. The study will describe between-group differences in β-cell deterioration (HOMA-β) and the need to escalate the medication regimen. The study also will describe the mediating effects of changes in self-efficacy on the relationship between randomization assignment and GV, HbA1c, and HOMA-β. The study will describe the impact of the interventions on alternative measures of GV (standard deviation, coefficient of variation, Continuous Overall Net Glycemic Action, area under the curve, and frequency of out-of-range and seriously out-of-range glucose values).
Study Population
The study population includes adult men and women, 21-80 years of age, living in the New York City Metropolitan area and who have early-stage type 2 diabetes (defined as an HbA1c<8.0% and managed on lifestyle alone or lifestyle+metformin).
Description of Sites/Facilities Enrolling Participants/Sample size and Randomization
The study will enroll participants from NYU Langone Faculty Group Practices and NYU Langone affiliates located in the New York City metropolitan area. The study expects to enroll 300 individuals, and randomize 255. Participants will be stratified by medication regimen (metformin versus no metformin) and randomized within strata.
Description of Study Intervention/Experimental Manipulation
Eligible participants will be stratified by treatment with metformin (yes or no) and randomized with equal allocation to UCC, Standardized, or Personalized. All 3 groups will receive usual care plus education regarding the nature of T2D, consequences of uncontrolled glycemia, performance and interpretation of capillary glucose monitoring, and the importance of medication adherence. Participants randomized to Standardized will also experience Social Cognitive Theory (SCT)-based behavioral counseling to follow an isocaloric Mediterranean diet. Participants randomized to Personalized will receive the same SCT-based counseling as Standardized, plus personalized guidance to minimize PPGR, using a gut microbiome-based algorithm.
Measurements will occur at 0, 3, and 6 months. [screening A1c usually takes place before T=0]
Source: View full study details on ClinicalTrials.gov
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. By listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
